The upward revision of the anti-terrorism pact ends in a stalemate, in the crossfire of PNV and PP.
did not go far relaunch Zapatero, following the ETA bomb, which, together with the lives of Diego Armando Estacio and Carlos Antonio Palate and the car park of Terminal 4 at Barajas Airport, has also destroyed the attempt to dialogue.
There was, moreover, to expect different solutions: the PP had no intention of changing its position and accept A new pact meant abandoning the old, which represented the institutional side of a political and institutional behavior has very little, nor the PSOE had done nothing to actually build the conditions for submitting a new pact with English political parties.
What is striking, if anything, is that PNV and PP have not given up on playing their role as "beaters free." In particular, the Basque nationalist Catholics, who have placed conditions bays in the air as the lifting of the Ley de partidos, lifting the weight from the shoulders of the PP to be the only party to prevent the deal. The dynamics
Basque own pathways. The bomb detonates T4 contradictions even within Batasuna, the party left-wing separatist outlawed by the Ley partidos basis that it is the political arm of ETA.
Otegi, the leader of Batsuna (but is still the case?), Did not condemn the attack, removing the possibility of a return to legality of the Basque party for the next administration. The PNV, which over the last few years has increased its independent also draw votes for the radical left in the tank that no longer has a representative election, wants to continue on this road, and then proposes to abandon outright the Ley, especially if they do not do anything , with an eye to voters penalized by law.
Voters who have cast votes in the Communist Party of the Basque lands, training that presents itself for years but broke through in the last few administrative Batasuna as an expression of the electorate, and which, for its part, the PP has asked the outlawed as a condition to discuss the new covenant. Another request inadmissible. Despite
zapatero has launched the new pact only as a defensive move - throwing him in the face of the PP, and later moved with a little 'irritated, rather than making a concrete proposal - the main problem of English democracy lies in the failure before ETA unity of democratic forces in front of radicalism, terrorism and political independence, as an attempt to dialogue with Zapatero has shown.
Unitless not you talk to a separatist terrorist group. No government is capable of supporting a deal with the major opposition party against.
The pact is effectively dead terrorist. Why not adapted to the times. The text rules out any dialogue with ETA, and that in itself is enough to make it outdated. But because it is passed down from a period of political concluded it made sense in 2000, when it expresses the covenant between the parties "constitutionalists" (PP and PSOE), the practical construction of a mass rejection of terrorism in the Basque Country, isolation independence of the positions and the response to the tactics of the PNV, ready to accelerate its independent positions to consolidate his power. Now he has not more.
Now, to go forward, we need a new pact among all parties reject violence as a political tool and recognize the Constitution.
Or rather, no deal.
Rather than this Pact now continuously betrayed and inappropriate to the times, which clings to now only the PP for the prestige of his position, better than the parties in parliament and are responsible for their own choices at the polls.
0 comments:
Post a Comment